College Composition and Communication †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the College Composition and Communication. Answer: Introduction The methodology that helps all the designers in the world to solve several difficult and complex problems is known as design thinking (Bjgvinsson, Ehn Hillgren, 2012). The designers use this particular methodology for providing relevant solutions for their clients and customers. This process of design thinking draws on the intuition, reasoning, imagination and logic for finding the solutions or the probability of what could be found out. The client is extremely benefitted from this particular process. I had been following my subject of Design IT since the very first class (Howlett, 2014). My lecturer Professor Jeffery helped me a lot to understand the basic concept of design thinking by involving me in several activities. I have written blogs on my ten classes of Design IT and this report is a self-reflective analysis of all the classes. The following report outlines a brief description on the ten classes I have attended of Design IT. The ten classes that I have described are the Design IT, various types of models in design thinking, the art of innovation, changes made in daily life, design thinking tools, joining the dots, ethical design research, prototyping, launch, marketing and fundraising (Melles, Howard Thompson-Whiteside, 2012). The self reflective report describes about my strengths and weaknesses, that is what are my strengths and weaknesses and how can I improve myself in any aspect. Moreover, the report further contains my action plans. In my first class, I learnt about the basic concept of design thinking. Groups were made. We were provided with a paper and all of us wrote a sentence or two about the course. We selected a specific topic (Razzouk Shute, 2012). We passed our paper to other groups and everybody approved our idea of advertising organizations. The knowledge that I gathered from this particular class was to think out of the box and understand the basic concept of design thinking and the benefits of design thinking. Various types of Models in Design Thinking After the second class, I was enjoying the subject even more. The best line that I heard in this class was People who make things happen, people who watch things happen, people who wonder things happen (Lammi, Becker, 2013). I understood the interpretation of this line. My professor made the class extremely interesting, that I was more active in this class. I learnt that there were several different types of models that are involved in the design thinking. This process is completed by following few steps. The steps are empathize, define, ideate, prototype and test. If any one of the step is not successful, it is considered to a failure. We carried out in the class this small activity. We were shown a video in the class and groups were made (Viswanathan Linsey, 2012). We were asked to jot down few questions from the video. It was about a shopping cart, designed and manufactured by IDEO (see photo in blog entry 3, August 3 2017). They actually manufactured in five days. There were teams of experts for designing this. The cart had hooks on it sides. The baskets are removable so that they can be carried separately. A scanner even scans the product for pricing. Another advantage is that there is a carrier for small babies. It was a prototype, however was sanctioned by supermarkets. The lesson I got from this activity was that how teams can work and everybody has the right to speak about their ideas (Melles, Howard Thompson-Whiteside, 2012). Moreover, if a person is allowed to speak his words, he would be motivated. The most interesting and innovative I learnt from my third class was a video of Guy Kawasaki The Art of Innovation (See video in blog entry 4, August 7 2017). This was one of the best experiences in the class (Razzouk Shute, 2012). I got to know about many things. The main points were to make the meaning for what one is working, not to worry much and polarize people. Apart from this video, Professor Jeffery, descried about my next class, which would be on posters. Changes made in Daily Life This class was slight different from the rest. My professor, decided to give an exercise on what sort of changes you can make for daily things we use (Kolko, 2015). Precisely, he wanted us to change our all types of daily things like office chair, ice cream cone, and coffee cups holders and may more that we use daily. We simple had to search for the solutions. All of us shared our views. Moreover, my lecturer even shared his personal experiences. The second exercise was to make the process of carrying baggage to the beach easier (Plattner, Meinel Leifer, 2014). We were provided with ten minutes and our team came up with the best idea. The fifth class focused on the tools for design thinking. I was absent in this particular class. However, I have gone through the slides of my lecturer and understood the concept (Pourdehnad, Wexler Wilson, 2012). The first design thinking tool that was discussed in the class was mind mapping. This design thinking tool is extremely useful when working in a group. This helps in getting an idea for the solution of a problem.The second tool was journey mapping. It refers to the feedback of customers for a product. This is one of the most important tool for design thinking. The third tool is the value chain analysis. This tool provides a view on how many stages will be carried out in an organization for designing a product. This class started with the discussion on the marks of our assignments. My lecturer described about the mistakes made by us. We were again formed into several groups. This class had several activities (Noweski et al., 2012). However, the activity that I loved the most was joining the dots with only four straight lines. This is again another example of how to get out of the problem and think rationally. The TedX videos were extremely helpful to me in this activity. Ethical Design Research This paragraph helps to understand the data collection, ethics and research methods in design thinking. Ethics is the set of rules that we should follow strictly in our life and work place (Purdy, 2014). Research is the systematic collection and interpretation of information for finding solutions. Research has a clear motive. Data collection is of two types; the primary data and the secondary data. The methods of collecting primary data are interviewing, preparing questionnaires, semi structured interviews and group interviews. Whereas, the various methods of collecting secondary data are websites, books, news and articles (Vianna, 2012). I can surely conclude that design thinking is linked with data collection, research and ethics. This was my seventh class in the subject of design thinking. The activity that we did in the class was to design a prototype for the problem that is mentioned in the picture (See photo in blog 9, September 6, 2017). We were three members in our group. My group had designed a refrigerator (Plattner, Meinel Leifer, 2012). A simple refrigerator that has a camera on every section of it. By installation of an application on our smart phone we can have a look of all the ingredients in a fridge so that when we go out for buying we can have a look first of what needs to be taken.The lesson I got from this class was to deal with problems easily. Our second activity was to make a dessert. This class taught us about launching a product in market. I have learnt three main things in this class. They are the initial launch plan, the secondary launch plan and the real launch plan (Johansson?Skldberg, Woodilla etinkaya, 2013). The initial launch plan is basically a research type plan on your product. The initial launch plan helps to understand about the probable outcomes of the product. The secondary launch is generally a rough plan for your product.This plan helps to understand the benefits of the product and also the estimated budget of the product. The real launch plan is the actual launch plan for your product (Mootee, 2013). This is no longer a learning plan, here you will be delivering a new innovative solution from your product. This plan is done with proper planning. I have understood from my classes that any product becomes successful from its marketing. I have learnt many things like creating personas and targeting markets. Personas are imaginary customers that a company creates for its products (Carlgren, 2013). I also learnt about the 4PS of marketing, which are the product, price, promotion and place and the entrepreneurial marketing campaigns. There are three types of competitor analysis. They are the direct, indirect and the future competitors. Fundraising is the set of actions that are carried out for a distinct time for gaining access to the financial resources, needed for achieving the goals and objectives. These funds are collected for several goals like cancer research, charities, starting new venture and many more (Birkeland, 2012). There are few methods for this funding. The common examples are stock markets, 3fs, own money and bootstrapping. Action Plan and Strengths or Weaknesses The ten classes that I have attended on Design Thinking have helped me to understand the concept easily. At first, I had vague ideas on the topics. However, as I was more involved in the classes, the concepts were clear. Moreover, the activities that Professor Jeffery arranged for us were extremely beneficial and refreshing for both our knowledge and mind. We understood how to work in groups and how to think out of the box. Moreover, these activities even taught us to come up with innovative ideas and solutions to the most dangerous problems. Professor Jeffery helped us to understand that every problem has a simple solution that can be obtained without any kind of mental pressure. I also understood how to work on time and how to execute any activity within time. The knowledge I have gathered from these classes would be helping me in my future life. The action plan is a sequence of steps that are undertaken for achieving a distinct goal or objective. My action plan for design thinking is as follows: Goals Tasks Time Frame Requirements 1. Think with Creativity Understand the research methods Within one to two months Proper guidance and education. 2. Be Patient Understand the problem completely and then come up with ideas. Within one week Meditation and relaxation. 3. To do tasks out of the box Create something innovative for the society One to two months Think out of the box and start experimenting. These classes even helped me in identifying my strengths and weaknesses. The descriptions of my strengths and weaknesses are given below. Strengths: From the classes I understood that I have the ability to understand a concept easily. This is one of my strengths. Before joining the classes, I had no idea about this capability. These classes helped me to do so. My second strength is to think out of the box. I have an innovative and creative mind that helps me in providing innovating solutions to any problem. Weaknesses: In spite of having some strength, I do have some weaknesses as well that I got to know from these classes. I am little impatient regarding everything. For example, during one of the class, I was not being able to come up with creative ideas. I became hyperactive due to this. However, at the end of the day I was successful. I can overcome this weakness by simply focusing on my work and worrying less. Conclusion Therefore, from the self reflective report I can conclude that, the methodology, which helps every designer for solving various complex and difficult issues is known as the process of design thinking. Any designer utilizes this specific methodology to provide significant solutions for their customers or clients. This procedure of design thinking normally draws on the imagination, intuition, logic and reasoning for searching all the solutions or the possibility of what could be searched for. The client is absolutely benefitted from this specific procedure. I have given blogs on all of my ten classes on the subject of Design IT and this particular report is a self-reflective analysis of all those classes. The above report clearly defines about the description of the ten classes of Design Thinking. Moreover, the report further discusses about the strengths and weaknesses that I have understood after attending the classes and how I can improve myself by eradicating the weaknesses. My act ion plans are also provided here. References Birkeland, J. (2012). Design blindness in sustainable development: from closed to open systems design thinking.Journal of Urban Design,17(2), 163-187. Bjgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P. A. (2012). Design things and design thinking: Contemporary participatory design challenges.Design Issues,28(3), 101-116. Carlgren, L. (2013).Design thinking as an enabler of innovation: Exploring the concept and its relation to building innovation capabilities. Chalmers University of Technology. Howlett, M. (2014). From the oldto the newpolicy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance.Policy Sciences,47(3), 187-207. Johansson?Skldberg, U., Woodilla, J., etinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures.Creativity and Innovation Management,22(2), 121-146. Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age.Harvard Business Review,93(9), 66-71. Lammi, M., Becker, K. (2013). Engineering design thinking. Melles, G., Howard, Z., Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2012). Teaching design thinking: Expanding horizons in design education.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,31, 162-166. Mootee, I. (2013).Design thinking for strategic innovation: What they can't teach you at business or design school. John Wiley Sons. Noweski, C., Scheer, A., Bttner, N., von Thienen, J., Erdmann, J., Meinel, C. (2012). Towards a paradigm shift in education practice: Developing twenty-first century skills with design thinking. InDesign thinking research(pp. 71-94). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (2012).Design thinking research. Springer. Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (Eds.). (2014).Design Thinking Research: Building Innovators. Springer. Pourdehnad, J., Wexler, E. R., Wilson, D. V. (2012). Systems design thinking: A conceptual framework for their integration. ? ,4(6). Purdy, J. P. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies?.College composition and communication,65(4), 612. Razzouk, R., Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?.Review of Educational Research,82(3), 330-348. Vianna, M. (2012).Design Thinking: inovao em negcios. Design Thinking. Viswanathan, V. K., Linsey, J. S. (2012). Physical models and design thinking: A study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas.Journal of Mechanical Design,134(9), 091004.